|Year : 2023 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 59-65
Systematic review of the use of metformin compared to insulin for the management of gestational diabetes: Implications for low-resource settings
Ribal Kattini1, Len Kelly2, Ruben Hummelen3
1 Sioux Lookout Local Education Group, Sioux Lookout, Ontario, Canada; Medical Student, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
2 Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre, Sioux Lookout, Ontario, Canada
3 Division of Clinical Sciences, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sioux Lookout, Ontario, Canada
|Date of Submission||14-May-2022|
|Date of Acceptance||24-Jun-2022|
|Date of Web Publication||24-Mar-2023|
MD, M Clin Sci Len Kelly
Sioux Lookout Meno Ya Win Health Centre, Sioux Lookout, Ontario
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Introduction: This systematic review examines the effectiveness of metformin treatment compared to insulin treatment for gestational diabetes within the context of a low-resource environment.
Methods: Electronic data searches of Medline, EMBASE, Scopus and Google scholar databases from 1 January, 2005 to 30 June, 2021 were performed using medical subject headings: 'gestational diabetes or pregnancy diabetes mellitus' AND 'Pregnancy or pregnancy outcomes' AND 'Insulin' AND 'Metformin Hydrochloride Drug Combination/or Metformin/or Hypoglycemic Agents' AND 'Glycemic control or blood glucose'.
Randomized controlled trials were included if: participants were pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); the interventions were metformin and/or insulin. Studies among women with pre-gestational diabetes, non-randomised control trials or studies with a limited description of the methodology were excluded. Outcomes included adverse maternal outcomes: weight gain, C-section, pre-eclampsia and glycaemic control and adverse neonatal outcomes: birth weight, macrosomia, pre-term birth and neonatal hypoglycaemia. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment for randomised trials was used for the evaluation of bias.
Results: We screened 164 abstracts and 36 full-text articles. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies provide moderate to high-quality evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of metformin as an alternative therapy to insulin. Risk of bias was low; multiple countries and robust sample sizes improved external validity. All studies were from urban centres with no rural data.
Conclusion: These recent high quality studies comparing metformin to insulin for the treatment of GDM generally found either improved or equivalent pregnancy outcome and good glycaemic control for most patients, although many required insulin supplementation. Its ease of use, safety and efficacy suggest metformin may simplify the management of gestational diabetes, particularly in rural and other low-resource environments.
Introduction: Cette revue systématique examine l'efficacité du traitement par metformine par rapport au traitement par insuline pour le diabète gestationnel dans le contexte d'un environnement à faibles ressources.
Méthodes: Des recherches de données électroniques ont été effectuées dans les bases de données Medline, Embase, Scopus et Google scholar du 1er janvier 2005 au 30 juin 2021 en utilisant les termes MeSH: 'gestational diabetes or pregnancy diabetes mellitus' AND 'Pregnancy or pregnancy outcomes' AND 'Insulin' AND 'Metformin Hydrochloride Drug Combination/or Metformin/or Hypoglycemic Agents' AND 'Glycemic control or blood glucose'.
Les essais contrôlés randomisés ont été inclus si: les participantes étaient des femmes enceintes atteintes de diabète gestationnel (DG); les interventions étaient la metformine et/ou l'insuline. Les études portant sur des femmes atteintes de diabète prégestationnel, les essais contrôlés non randomisés ou les études dont la description de la méthodologie était limitée ont été exclus. Les résultats comprenaient des résultats maternels défavorables: prise de poids, césarienne, prééclampsie, contrôle glycémique et des résultats néonatals défavorables: poids de naissance, macrosomie, naissance prématurée et hypoglycémie néonatale. La version révisée de l'évaluation du risque de biais de Cochrane pour les essais randomisés a été utilisée pour l'évaluation du biais.
Résultats: Nous avons examiné 164 résumés et 36 articles complets. Quatorze études répondaient aux critères d'inclusion. Les études fournissent des preuves modérées à de haute qualité démontrant l'efficacité de la metformine comme thérapie alternative à l'insuline. Le risque de biais était faible; la multiplicité des pays et la taille robuste des échantillons ont amélioré la validité externe. Toutes les études provenaient de centres urbains, sans données rurales.
Conclusion: Ces études récentes de haute qualité comparant la metformine à l'insuline pour le traitement du DG ont généralement constaté une amélioration ou une équivalence de l'issue de la grossesse et un bon contrôle glycémique pour la plupart des patientes, bien que beaucoup d'entre elles aient eu besoin d'un supplément d'insuline. Sa facilité d'utilisation, son innocuité et son efficacité suggèrent que la metformine pourrait simplifier la prise en charge du diabète gestationnel, notamment en milieu rural et dans d'autres environnements à faibles ressources.
Mots clés: Diabète gestationnel, traitement, metformine, rural
Keywords: Gestational diabetes, metformin, rural, treatment
|How to cite this article:|
Kattini R, Kelly L, Hummelen R. Systematic review of the use of metformin compared to insulin for the management of gestational diabetes: Implications for low-resource settings. Can J Rural Med 2023;28:59-65
|How to cite this URL:|
Kattini R, Kelly L, Hummelen R. Systematic review of the use of metformin compared to insulin for the management of gestational diabetes: Implications for low-resource settings. Can J Rural Med [serial online] 2023 [cited 2023 May 28];28:59-65. Available from: https://www.cjrm.ca/text.asp?2023/28/2/59/372319
| Introduction|| |
Rural Canadians are estimated to have higher rates of diabetes, complications and undiagnosed diabetes.,,,, This difference extends to pregnancy where increased rates of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) contribute to higher maternal and neonatal morbidity.,, While GDM affects approximately 6% of Canadian pregnancies, rates are much higher (12%) in Northwest Ontario with a large First Nations population.
Treatment of GDM decreases the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. For decades, insulin has been the recommended treatment but requires self-administration by injection and regular monitoring of glucose levels. This can be challenging in rural areas where physician and dietary resources are limited and weather and geography can make frequent follow up impractical.
Metformin, an oral biguanide hypoglycaemic, has recently been introduced as a more user-friendly alternative to insulin in the treatment of GDM., It improves glucose metabolism by suppressing hepatic glucose production and increases gut metabolism and peripheral glucose uptake. Unlike other hypoglycaemics, there is no associated risk of hypoglycemia.
This review of recent literature compares the effectiveness of metformin to insulin in improving pregnancy outcomes and achieving glycaemic control in women with diabetes in pregnancy.
| Methods|| |
Electronic data searches of Medline, Embase, Scopus and Google Scholar databases from 1 January, 2005 to 30 June, 2021 were performed using medical subject headings terms: 'gestational diabetes or pregnancy diabetes mellitus' AND 'Pregnancy or pregnancy outcomes' AND 'Insulin' AND 'Metformin Hydrochloride Drug Combination/or Metformin/or Hypoglycemic Agents' AND 'Glycemic control or blood glucose'.
Studies were included if they met 3 criteria: participants were pregnant women with GDM; the interventions were metformin with or without supplemental insulin, and insulin alone; studies were randomized controlled trials reporting on the outcomes of interest. Studies among women with pre-gestational diabetes, non-randomised control trials or studies with a limited description of the methodology, non-English language and abstracts/posters were excluded.
Outcomes studied were adverse maternal outcomes: Weight gain, C-section, pre-eclampsia and glycaemic control and adverse neonatal outcomes: Birth weight, macrosomia, pre-term birth and neonatal hypoglycaemia.
Data extraction and quality assessment
Data included authors, year published, number of subjects, study design, results. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment for randomised trials was used for the evaluation of bias.
| Results|| |
The review included 14 randomised controlled trials on the use of metformin as a treatment for GDM.,,,,,,,,,,,,, All studies compared the pregnancy outcomes of metformin-treated patients with insulin-treated patients, and all examined the effectiveness of metformin in achieving glycaemic control. Eleven countries were represented with 60–751 participants (average 180) [Figure 1].
Maternal outcomes for women treated with metformin compared to insulin, experienced lower maternal weight gain in 7 studies,,,,,,[Table 1].
|Table 1: Maternal outcomes for metformin use compared to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes|
Click here to view
All but two studies found C-section rates were unaffected by metformin use. A 2011 study (n = 97) identified a tendency towards increased C-sections, while a larger 2021 study (n = 200) found a lower incidence.,
Neonatal outcomes were favourable: 4 studies have found less hypoglycaemia in the metformin-treated group.,,, Neonatal birth weight was found to be significantly lower in the metformin group compared to insulin in four different studies.,,, Rates of pre-term birth were lower in the metformin group in 1 study which excluded women who required insulin supplementation. Two studies found an increase in pre-term births (P = 0.04), but no increased incidence of either neonatal respiratory distress or neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission.,
Other pregnancy outcomes not assessed across all studies found a positive metformin profile associated with severe maternal hypoglycaemia, mean neonatal glucose level at birth, neonatal jaundice, respiratory distress and NICU admission,,,,, [Table 2].
|Table 2: Neonatal outcomes for metformin use compared to insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes|
Click here to view
All 14 studies concluded that metformin was effective in the management of GDM, but in 12 studies, between 3% and 46% of patients started on the metformin required supplemental insulin to maintain glycaemic control [Table 2]. Patient satisfaction with metformin use was high., Rowan's 2008 study (n = 751) found more women would choose to receive their assigned metformin treatment again (76.6% vs. 27.2%, P < 0.001) compared to insulin-treated women.
Patients on combination therapy had lower median dose of insulin (42 vs. 50 units. P = 0.002) and had similar pregnancy outcomes to those treated with metformin alone. The group of patients requiring insulin supplementation had distinct baseline characteristics: higher body mass index, glucose levels and gestational age at diagnosis and had a higher proportion of Maori or Pacific Islander Indigenous patients (30% vs. 13%, P < 0.001).
The study with the highest proportion of participants requiring supplemental insulin (46%), occurred in 10 urban obstetrical hospitals in New Zealand and Australia, and enrolled 363 patients in the metformin group. They defined adequate control as <30% of glycaemic measurements in the reference range (fasting <5.5 mmol/L; 2-h pc <7.0 mmol/L). These target levels are less stringent than present recommended Canadian values of 5.3 mmol/L and 6.7 mmol/L. Insulin supplementation commenced at a median of 20.4 days (interquartile range 12.4–27.5) after beginning metformin.
Assessment of risk of bias
Bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2) which assesses studies across 7 fields including randomisation process, deviation from intervention, missing data outcomes, measurement of outcomes, selection of results reported and overall bias risk. Thirteen of the included studies had a low risk of bias and 1 study had minimal bias concerns [Figure 2].
|Figure 2: Assessment of the risk of bias in the included studies Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials.|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
All 14 studies found metformin-treated patients had improved, or equivalent, pregnancy outcomes. Metformin was protective of neonatal hypoglycemia, macrosomia and maternal weight gain. Two studies documented a higher number of pre-term births in patients using metformin, but no increase in neonatal respiratory distress or NIU admission., Nine studies found no difference.,,,,,,,,,,, This finding is supported by a 2021 meta-analysis of 4545 subjects (including type 2 diabetes mellitus patients) that found an equivalent incidence of pre-term birth.
Metformin was effective for glycaemic control, but 3%–46% of patients required supplemental insulin for glycaemic control in eight studies,,,,,,, [Table 1].
Diabetes Canada supports the use of metformin or insulin for the treatment of GDM when diet and physical activity fail to achieve adequate glycaemic control, but counsels that metformin crosses the placenta. While follow-up studies have not shown developmental concerns, longer-term studies are needed., The literature generally compares an intervention to 'routine care' and assumes insulin therapy is accompanied by adequate monitoring and follow up. This may not be the case in all rural practices, where metformin may be more manageable than insulin therapy.
Adopting practical and effective treatment approaches is particularly important in primary care and rural and remote communities where access to specialist care is limited.
There was no direct rural context in the reviewed studies. They were in large urban centres and no rural population subsets were identified. It was assumed that adequate dietary and clinical support and monitoring existed. Patient performance of glycaemic monitoring or insulin administration was not measured.
| Conclusion|| |
Recent high quality studies comparing metformin to insulin for the treatment of GDM generally found either improved or equivalent pregnancy outcome and good glycaemic control for most patients, although many required insulin supplementation. Its ease of use, safety and efficacy suggest metformin may simplify the management of gestational diabetes, particularly in rural and remote communities.
Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.
Conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Leiter LA, Barr A, Bélanger A, Lubin S, Ross SA, Tildesley HD, et al.
Diabetes screening in Canada (DIASCAN) study: Prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and glucose intolerance in family physician offices. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1038-43.
Booth GL, Hux JE, Fang J, Chan BT. Time trends and geographic disparities in acute complications of diabetes in Ontario, Canada. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1045-50.
Dyck R, Karunanayake C, Pahwa P, Hagel L, Lawson J, Rennie D, et al.
Prevalence, risk factors and co-morbidities of diabetes among adults in rural Saskatchewan: The influence of farm residence and agriculture-related exposures. BMC Public Health 2013;13:7.
Berger H, Melamed N. Timing of delivery in women with diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Med 2014;7:8-16.
Feig DS, Hwee J, Shah BR, Booth GL, Bierman AS, Lipscombe LL. Trends in incidence of diabetes in pregnancy and serious perinatal outcomes: A large, population-based study in Ontario, Canada, 1996-2010. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1590-6.
Kattini R, Poirier JN, Kelly LF, Madden SN, Ockenden H, Dooley JP, et al.
Outcomes of pregnancies affected by gestational diabetes and type 2 diabetes in a rural first nations obstetrical program in Northwest Ontario. Can J Diabetes 2020;44:624-7.
Poirier J, Kattini R, Kelly L, Madden S, Voth B, Dooley J, et al.
Screening for gestational diabetes in pregnancy in Northwestern Ontario. Can J Rural Med 2020;25:61-6.
] [Full text]
Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS, et al.
Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2005;352:2477-86.
O'Sullivan JB, Gellis SS, Dandrow RV, Tenney BO. The potential diabetic and her treatment in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1966;27:683-9.
Barbour LA, Feig DS. Metformin for gestational diabetes mellitus: Progeny, perspective, and a personalized approach. Diabetes Care 2019;42:396-9.
Hyer S, Balani J, Shehata H. Metformin in pregnancy: Mechanisms and clinical applications. Int J Mol Sci 2018;19:1954.
Rena G, Hardie DG, Pearson ER. The mechanisms of action of metformin. Diabetologia 2017;60:1577-85.
Nasri H, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Metformin: Current knowledge. J Res Med Sci 2014;19:658-64.
Ainuddin J, Karim N, Hasan AA, Naqvi SA. Metformin versus insulin treatment in gestational diabetes in pregnancy in a developing country: A randomized control trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015;107:290-9.
Ashoush S, El-Said M, Fathi H, Abdelnaby M. Identification of metformin poor responders, requiring supplemental insulin, during randomization of metformin versus insulin for the control of gestational diabetes mellitus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2016;42:640-7.
Ghomian N, Vahed SH, Firouz S, Yaghoubi MA, Mohebbi M, Sahebkar A. The efficacy of metformin compared with insulin in regulating blood glucose levels during gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial. J Cell Physiol 2019;234:4695-701.
Hamadani A, Zahid S, Butt ZB. Metformin versus insulin treatment in gestational diabetes in pregnancy and their effects on neonatal birthweight. Pak J Med Health Sci 2017;11:914-6.
Ijäs H, Vääräsmäki M, Morin-Papunen L, Keravuo R, Ebeling T, Saarela T, et al.
Metformin should be considered in the treatment of gestational diabetes: A prospective randomised study. BJOG 2011;118:880-5.
Mesdaghinia E, Samimi M, Homaei Z, Saberi F, Moosavi SG, Yaribakht M. Comparison of newborn outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with metformin or insulin: A randomised blinded trial. Int J Prev Med 2013;4:327-33.
Niromanesh S, Alavi A, Sharbaf FR, Amjadi N, Moosavi S, Akbari S. Metformin compared with insulin in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus: A randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012;98:422-9.
Picón-César MJ, Molina-Vega M, Suárez-Arana M, González-Mesa E, Sola-Moyano AP, Roldan-López R, et al.
Metformin for gestational diabetes study: Metformin versus insulin in gestational diabetes: Glycemic control and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes: Randomized prospective trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2021;225:517.e1- 517.e17.
Rowan JA, Hague WM, Gao W, Battin MR, Moore MP, MiG Trial Investigators. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:2003-15.
Ruholamin S, Eshaghian S, Allame Z. Neonatal outcomes in women with gestational diabetes mellitus treated with metformin in compare with insulin: A randomized clinical trial. J Res Med Sci 2014;19:970-5.
Saleh HS, Abdelsalam WA, Mowafy HE, Abd ElHameid AA. Could metformin manage gestational diabetes mellitus instead of insulin? Int J Reprod Med 2016;2016:3480629.
Spaulonci CP, Bernardes LS, Trindade TC, Zugaib M, Francisco RP. Randomized trial of metformin versus insulin in the management of gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:7.e1-7.
Tertti K, Ekblad U, Koskinen P, Vahlberg T, Rönnemaa T. Metformin versus. Insulin in gestational diabetes. A randomized study characterizing metformin patients needing additional insulin. Diabetes Obes Metab 2013;15:246-51.
He K, Guo Q, Ge J, Li J, Li C, Jing Z. The efficacy and safety of metformin alone or as an add-on therapy to insulin in pregnancy with GDM or T2DM: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Pharm Ther 2022;47:168-77.
Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee, Feig DS, Berger H, Donovan L, Godbout A, Kader T, et al.
Diabetes and pregnancy. Can J Diabetes 2018;42 Suppl 1:S255-82.
Tertti K, Eskola E, Rönnemaa T, Haataja L. Neurodevelopment of two-year-old children exposed to metformin and insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2015;36:752-7.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]